tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10136851.post111265336805781119..comments2024-03-28T22:33:33.687-07:00Comments on She Just Walks Around With It: No One Told Me There'd Be Math, Part Onekristyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00879301751663532121noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10136851.post-1112723303941319452005-04-05T10:48:00.000-07:002005-04-05T10:48:00.000-07:00hi lucia,thanks for your help! i did realize (see...hi lucia,<BR/><BR/>thanks for your help! i did realize (see part two) that a big part of my problem is that i was multiplying incorrectly. <BR/><BR/>i think i worked out the 2-fewer-stitch thing okay, though.<BR/><BR/>nice lace dishcloth, btw!kristyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00879301751663532121noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10136851.post-1112673747014729592005-04-04T21:02:00.000-07:002005-04-04T21:02:00.000-07:00K1, (k2tog, k6) 6 times, k2tog, k7 -51 sts actuall...<I>K1, (k2tog, k6) 6 times, k2tog, k7 -51 sts actually means 1 + (2 + 6)6 + 2 + 7 = x</I><BR/><BR/>Uhmm... the k2tog means Hmm.. you're kidding about the 66, right?<BR/><BR/>Well, in case you aren't: "knit 2 together" takes 2 stitches and convert it into 1 stitch.<BR/><BR/>So, when you finish the row, you nave<BR/><BR/>1 + (1 + 6)* 6 +1 + 7 = 51<BR/><BR/>You're supposed to end with 51. (And, amazingly enough, you have found a pattern that is <EM>not</EM> edited for brevity, or they wouldn't even tell you that.)<BR/><BR/>.... not enough data provided to answer "what if I started with 56".luciahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12342621789338198739noreply@blogger.com